Learning target: I can find the errors in a classmate's statements about cellular respiration, explain what went wrong in each one, and rewrite each statement so that it is scientifically accurate.
Jade wrote seven statements on an exit ticket. Some are correct and some contain a mistake that many students make. In Part A, decide which statements are correct and underline the word or phrase in each incorrect one that gives the mistake away. In Part B, for each incorrect statement, explain what Jade was probably thinking, why it is wrong, and write a corrected version. Do not just add the word 'not'; rewrite the idea so it is true and specific. Part C asks you to step back and look for the pattern in the mistakes.
You will need: This worksheet, Pencil
| Correct or incorrect? | The word or phrase that gives it away |
|---|---|
| Statement 1 | |
| Statement 2 | |
| Statement 3 | |
| Statement 4 | |
| Statement 5 | |
| Statement 6 | |
| Statement 7 |
For each incorrect statement, write three things: (a) What Jade was thinking: the reasonable idea that led to the mistake. (b) Why it is wrong: the evidence or the science that shows it. (c) The rewrite: a corrected statement in one or two sentences.
Run each of Jade's statements through these tests. Matter test: does the statement keep track of every atom, or does matter appear, disappear or turn into something that is not matter? Energy test: does the statement say energy is released or converted (good), or created or made (bad)? Who test: does the statement claim a process belongs to only one kind of organism? If a statement fails a test, that test tells you what to rewrite.
Write a new statement that a careful student might get wrong about the carbon in a potato's starch after you eat it, then trade with a partner and diagnose each other's statement using the three tests in the scaffold. Your statement must be tempting: it should sound right at first, and the error should be about where atoms go or where energy goes, not a simple vocabulary slip.