Learning target: I can observe two reactions whose balance readings change in opposite directions, record what I notice and wonder, and write a first explanation that says where mass could have come from or gone.
Read the two demonstrations and study the figure. The numbers are a teaching dataset written to be realistic; your teacher may show the real demonstrations instead. Write what you notice before you try to explain anything. Then answer the questions in complete sentences. There are no wrong first explanations on this sheet; the goal is to write one you can test later.
You will need: This worksheet, Pencil
Demonstration 1: chalk in vinegar. A plastic cup of vinegar sits on a balance that reads to 0.01 g. The cup and vinegar together read 86.40 g. A 2.00 g piece of white chalk made of calcium carbonate, broken into small lumps, is dropped in, so the balance should read 88.40 g. The chalk fizzes at once. Tiny bubbles stream up and pop at the surface for about twenty minutes. When the fizzing stops, no chalk is left and the balance reads 87.52 g. The cup is open to the air the whole time.
Demonstration 2: a copper pad in the heat. A new copper scouring pad is shiny and orange-pink. On the balance it reads 2.40 g. The teacher sets it on a very hot plate for ten minutes, using tongs. The pad slowly turns dull, then black. After it cools, it is placed back on the balance: 2.58 g. Nothing was added to the pad by hand. It sat in ordinary air the whole time.
If q5 is hard to start, use these frames. 'The reading in the cup went down because something ______ the cup. I think it was ______.' 'The reading for the pad went up because something ______ the pad. I think it was ______.' 'I think matter was / was not created or destroyed because ______.' Remember that air is matter even though you cannot see it.
Sketch an experiment that would test your q6 prediction fairly. Name the container, say what goes on the balance, list two things you would keep the same between the open and sealed versions, and state exactly what reading would support your explanation and what reading would force you to change it. Then explain one reason a sealed container could still give a slightly different reading even if your explanation is right.