Angela's Tools · Chapter 14 · Energy in Chemical Reactions Teacher guide · Lab 1

Four Mystery Packets: Which Way Does the Energy Go?

Investigation question: Four unlabeled packets go into water. Which ones release energy to the surroundings, which absorb it, and which do neither, and what evidence tells you?

Evidence-based mysteryGroups of 41 session Setup 7 · Activity 33 · Cleanup 8 min MS-PS1-6 · practiceMS-ETS1-2 · supports

Scientific purpose

Students measure the temperature of the water before and after each of four teacher-measured packets is added, classify each change as exothermic, endothermic or close to neutral from the data, and then use their evidence to match each packet to a description on a manufacturer's spec sheet. Two of the packets fizz but move the temperature in opposite directions, which separates 'gas is produced' from 'energy is released' and makes the thermometer, not the eye, the deciding instrument.

Why this helps students with this chapter

Students arrive believing that a change which looks energetic (fizzing, foaming) must be giving off energy, and that cold is something a cold pack makes. Measuring four changes with a thermometer, including two that fizz in opposite directions and one that does almost nothing, forces the classification to rest on where the energy went. Having to identify each packet from a spec sheet turns the measurements into evidence for an argument instead of numbers in a table.

Standards connections

MS-PS1-6 (practice, characterizing the chemical processes that a warming or cooling device could use): Before students can design a pack in Lab 2 they need to know which safe processes release thermal energy and which absorb it, and how much. This lab produces that evidence with the same reagents, so it is practice toward the design PE rather than evidence of it.

MS-ETS1-2 (supports, matching measured performance to a written specification): Matching each packet to a spec-sheet description from evidence is a small version of evaluating whether a material meets a stated requirement, which students do fully in Lab 3.

Roles (rotate each session)

Materials

ItemQuantityPerNote
Foam cups, 8 to 12 oz4groupLabel A, B, C, D with a marker before class. Foam slows heat loss to the table so the change is easier to see.
Digital thermometer or temperature probe reading to 0.1 °C1groupA kitchen instant-read thermometer works. Rinse and dry between stations.
Stopwatch or phone timer1group
Graduated cylinder or kitchen measuring cup marked at 50 mL1group
Room-temperature tap waterabout 200 mLgroupFill a pitcher the day before so it is at room temperature.
Packet A: calcium chloride pellets (ice-melt or pickling grade), 3 g, teacher-measured1 packetgroupIn a small labeled paper cup or folded paper. Anhydrous pellets give the largest rise; hydrated or lower-purity products warm less.
Packet B: citric acid 3 g and baking soda 3 g, pre-mixed dry, teacher-measured1 packetgroupThe dry mix is stable; it reacts only when water is added.
Packet C: table salt (sodium chloride), 3 g, teacher-measured1 packetgroup
Station D liquid: 3% hydrogen peroxide, 30 mL, poured by the teacher into cup D30 mLgroupCup D holds peroxide instead of water. Students are told it is 'a clear liquid that is not plain water'.
Packet D: dry active yeast, about 1 g (a quarter teaspoon), teacher-measured1 packetgroup
Wooden stirring sticks4group
Plastic tray or baking sheet to hold the four cups1groupCatches foam from station D and any spills.
Safety goggles1 pairstudent
Paper towels and a waste bucket1 setclass
Recording sheet and graph paper1 setstudent

Estimated cost: 20 to 35 per class of 8 groups, excluding thermometers (an estimate; Estimate. A 10 lb bag of calcium chloride ice melt (about $15) and a 1 lb jar of citric acid (about $8) supply dozens of classes; baking soda, table salt, a bottle of 3% peroxide and a packet of yeast total under $6; foam cups about $4. Digital kitchen thermometers run $8 to $12 each if the room has none.)

Safety

Teacher preparation and setup

  1. Weigh the packets the day before on a kitchen or lab balance: 3 g calcium chloride, 3 g citric acid plus 3 g baking soda mixed, 3 g salt, and about 1 g yeast per group. Fold each in paper or put it in a small labeled cup. Keep calcium chloride sealed; it pulls water from the air and clumps.
  2. Pilot station A and station D yourself with your actual products. If 3 g of your calcium chloride in 50 mL warms the water less than 5 °C, raise packet A to 5 g. If the peroxide and yeast warm less than 3 °C in three minutes, use fresh peroxide (it loses strength once opened) and a fresh yeast packet.
  3. Pour 30 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide into each cup D just before class and keep the cups on the trays; do not let students pour it.
  4. Print the spec sheet (it is on the recording sheet) and the data table; set a pitcher of water out the night before so it is at room temperature.
  5. Write the three-minute reading schedule on the board: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180 seconds.

Investigation design

Independent variableWhich packet is added (A, B, C or D)Dependent variableTemperature of the liquid over three minutes, and the temperature change from start to finishControlledSame volume of liquid in each cup (50 mL water; station D is a fixed 30 mL of peroxide); Same cup type and same tray position, so heat loss is similar; Same stirring (two gentle turns) and same reading schedule; Packet masses measured by the teacher, 3 g of solid at A, B and CTrialsOne trial per station per group; the class pools temperature changes on the board so each station has eight or more values to compare.ComparisonTemperature change at each station compared with zero and with the other stations; fizzing stations B and D compared with each other.

Student procedure

  1. Put on goggles. Set the four labeled cups on the tray. Read the spec sheet on your recording sheet so you know the four fillings you will be trying to identify.
  2. The safety captain measures 50 mL of room-temperature water into cups A, B and C. Cup D already holds 30 mL of a clear liquid that is not plain water; do not add water to it.
  3. For station A: the thermometer reader places the probe in the water, waits ten seconds, and reads the starting temperature. The recorder writes it in the 0 s row.
  4. The timer says 'go'; the safety captain tips packet A into the water and stirs gently twice. The timer calls 'read' every 30 seconds for three minutes while the reader reads and the recorder writes. Everyone also notes what they see and hear: fizzing, foam, color change, pellets disappearing.
  5. Rinse and dry the probe. Repeat steps 3 and 4 for station B (add packet B to the water) and station C (add packet C).
  6. For station D: read the starting temperature of the liquid in cup D, then add packet D (the yeast) on 'go' and record for three minutes. Expect foam; keep the cup on the tray.
  7. Compute the temperature change for each station (final minus starting; a drop is a negative number). Classify each station as exothermic, endothermic or close to neutral and write the evidence.
  8. Plot all four stations on the one graph, temperature against time, with a different symbol for each station. Label each line with its letter.
  9. Match each station to a spec-sheet filling (1 to 4). Write the evidence for each match. Then answer the analysis questions individually and compare within the group.

Expected observations

Likely difficulties

Structured debrief

  1. Pool every group's temperature change for each station on the board. Ask what the class agrees on: A and D warm, B cools, C barely moves. Point out that the spread within a station (a few degrees) is much smaller than the differences between stations, which is why the classification holds.
  2. Put stations B and D side by side: both fizzed, opposite directions. Ask students to state the rule they will carry into Lab 2: gas tells you matter left the system; only the thermometer (or light and sound) tells you which way energy went.
  3. Reveal the identities: A is calcium chloride, which dissolves exothermically; B is citric acid and baking soda, a genuine reaction that makes carbon dioxide and absorbs energy; C is table salt, which dissolves with almost no energy change; D is hydrogen peroxide breaking down into water and oxygen, sped up by an enzyme in the yeast. Note that A and C are dissolving processes, not reactions in the strict sense, while B and D form new substances.
  4. Return to the cold-pack question from the slides: at station B the water cooled first, then the cup, then the hand. Energy moved from hand to cup to water to the reacting system. No cold moved anywhere.
  5. Preview Lab 2: the hot-pack teams will use filling A and the cold-pack teams filling B, with criteria for temperature and time, so today's data are their starting point.

Recording sheet: what students fill in

Lab 1 recording sheet: Four mystery packets

You are a quality tester at a company that makes warming and cooling packs. Four candidate fillings arrived without labels. Measure what each one does in water, then use your evidence to work out which is which.

Manufacturer's spec sheet: the four candidate fillings — Filling 1, WarmSalt: an ionic solid that gives out energy as it dissolves; makes no gas. Filling 2, FizzCool: a dry mix of an acid and a carbonate; reacts in water, makes carbon dioxide gas and takes in energy. Filling 3, Plain: a common salt that dissolves with almost no energy change. Filling 4, OxyFoam: a clear liquid that breaks down into water and oxygen gas when a catalyst is added, giving out energy. One of the four stations uses a liquid instead of water; the packet at that station is the catalyst.
Temperature readings (°C) every 30 seconds
Time (s)Station AStation BStation CStation D
0 (before packet)
30
60
90
120
150
180
Change (180 s minus 0 s)
Observations and classification
StationWhat you saw and heardExothermic, endothermic or neutral?Evidence (use a number)Spec-sheet filling (1-4)
A
B
C
D
Temperature of each station over three minutes Temperature of each station over three minutes 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Time (s) Temperature (°C)
1.For station A, name the system and name two things in the surroundings. Which of those surroundings did your thermometer actually measure?
Answer: System: the calcium chloride and the calcium and chloride ions it becomes as it dissolves. Surroundings: the water in the cup, the cup itself, the air, the thermometer probe, your hand. The thermometer measured the water, which is the part of the surroundings closest to the system.
Why: The boundary goes around the matter that changes. The water is the surroundings that receives the energy first, so its temperature is the evidence. Accept answers that put the water inside the system if the student explains that it is the medium the ions spread into; chemists draw it either way.
2.Two stations fizzed. Did they move the temperature in the same direction? What does that tell you about using fizzing as evidence of energy direction?
Answer: No. Station B fizzed and cooled; station D foamed and warmed. Fizzing shows that a gas is being made (matter leaving the liquid), not which way energy is flowing, so fizzing cannot be used as evidence of exothermic or endothermic.
Why: This is the lab's central contrast and the basis of a listed chapter misconception. A full answer names both stations and states the rule.
✎Draw two boundary diagrams side by side: one for station A and one for station B. In each, draw a dashed boundary around the system, label the system and the surroundings, and draw an arrow showing which way energy crossed the boundary. Label each diagram exothermic or endothermic.
Answer: Two diagrams. Station A: dashed boundary around the pellets/ions; water, cup and hand labeled outside; arrow from inside to outside; labeled exothermic. Station B: dashed boundary around the citric acid, baking soda and the products (sodium citrate, carbon dioxide, water formed); water, cup and hand outside; arrow from outside to inside; labeled endothermic.
Why: The arrows are the point. Students who draw the arrow for B pointing out because 'gas came out' have confused matter leaving with energy leaving; the gas can be drawn leaving, but the energy arrow must point in.

Analysis questions: answer key

3.Station A's water went from 22.0 °C to 31.5 °C in 90 seconds and then stopped rising. Calculate the temperature change and the average change per 30-second interval during the rise. Show your work.
Answer: Change = 31.5 °C − 22.0 °C = +9.5 °C. The rise took 90 s, which is three 30-second intervals, so the average change per interval = 9.5 °C ÷ 3 ≈ 3.2 °C per 30 s.
Why: Final minus start, then divide by the number of intervals during the rise (not the full 180 s, since the prompt says the rise stopped at 90 s). Accept 3.17 or 'about 3 °C per 30 s' with the division shown.
Also acceptable: Accept a rate expressed per second (about 0.11 °C/s) or per minute (about 6.3 °C/min) if the arithmetic is shown.
4.Explain how you matched station B to its spec-sheet filling. Give two separate pieces of evidence and say which one could not have been replaced by just looking.
Answer: Station B fizzed (gas was made) and the temperature fell by several degrees (energy was absorbed). The only filling on the spec sheet that both makes gas and takes in energy is Filling 2, FizzCool. The temperature drop is the evidence that could not have been replaced by looking: fizzing is visible, but the direction of energy flow needs the thermometer, because station D also fizzed and warmed.
Why: A full answer uses two independent lines of evidence and recognizes that the thermometer reading was the deciding one because the other fizzing station went the other way.
5.Station C changed by about one degree or less. Does dissolving always involve an energy change? Use what you know about separating particles and about water surrounding them to explain why the change can be nearly zero.
Answer: No; the size and direction of the energy change depend on the substance. Separating the particles of a solid from one another takes energy in, and water molecules surrounding and attaching to the separated particles gives energy out. For table salt those two amounts are nearly equal (separating costs slightly more), so the net change is close to zero: a slight cooling. For calcium chloride the surrounding step gives out much more than the separating step costs, so it warms; for some salts, such as ammonium chloride in a cold pack, the separating step costs more, so it cools.
Why: This is the dissolving version of the bond-breaking and bond-forming model: pay in to separate, get paid when water attaches. Students need not know enthalpy values; the pattern of 'two amounts, compare them' is the target.
6.Write a word equation for station B that includes the word 'energy' on the correct side. The reactants are citric acid and baking soda (sodium bicarbonate); the products are sodium citrate, carbon dioxide and water. Then do the same for station D, where hydrogen peroxide becomes water and oxygen. Explain how you decided where to put 'energy' each time.
Answer: Station B: citric acid + sodium bicarbonate + energy → sodium citrate + carbon dioxide + water. Station D: hydrogen peroxide → water + oxygen + energy (the yeast's enzyme speeds it up but is not used up, so it is not written as a reactant). Decision: at B the surroundings cooled, so energy entered the system and belongs with the reactants; at D the liquid warmed, so energy left the system and belongs with the products.
Why: The placement rule from slide 16 applied to the lab's own data. Accept 'catalyst' or 'yeast' written above the arrow for D; do not accept yeast as a reactant without a note, though do not penalize heavily since the lab did not teach catalysts.
7.At station B, the cup felt cold to the recorder's hand after two minutes. Describe the direction of thermal energy flow between the hand, the cup, the water and the reacting system. Is anything called 'cold' moving?
Answer: Thermal energy flows from the warmer things to the cooler things: from the hand into the cup wall, from the cup into the water, and from the water into the reacting system, which is absorbing energy as citric acid and baking soda react. The hand feels cold because energy is leaving it. Nothing called cold moves anywhere; only energy moves, and it moves in one direction, toward the system.
Why: This is the chapter's first listed misconception. The chain hand → cup → water → system is the full-credit picture; the essential statement is that the hand loses energy.
8.You must choose one filling for a cooling pack and one for a warming pack to be sold in a camping store. Which do you pick for each, and what is one reason, based on your data or on safety, that you rejected the other exothermic filling for the warming pack?
Answer: Cooling pack: Filling 2, FizzCool (station B), the only one that absorbed energy. Warming pack: Filling 1, WarmSalt (station A, calcium chloride), because it warmed the most and fastest and made no gas. Reasons to reject Filling 4, OxyFoam (station D): it produces oxygen gas and foam, so a sealed pack could burst and would need venting; it warmed more slowly; and a liquid plus a catalyst is harder to store and activate than a dry salt and a water bubble.
Why: Students must use both data and a safety or practicality argument. Any one of the rejection reasons earns credit if it is tied to the observations.
9.Your group measured each station once. The class table shows station A's change ranged from +7.0 °C to +10.5 °C across groups. Give two reasons the values might differ and explain why pooling the class data makes the classification more trustworthy than one cup alone.
Answer: Possible reasons: slightly different starting water temperatures, water volumes or packet masses, pellets that absorbed moisture before use, a probe touching the cup bottom or read at a different moment, differences in stirring, a cup closer to a cold window. Pooling helps because one cup's error could push a value up or down, but eight or more cups give a range and a typical value; if every group's station A is positive and every station B is negative, the classification does not depend on any single measurement.
Why: Measurement variation and the value of replication. Full credit needs two plausible causes and a statement that the pattern across groups is stronger than one value.

Individual evidence of learning

Each student submits their own completed data table, observation and classification table, graph, boundary drawings and written answers to q1 through q9. The classification table and q4 are the primary evidence for reading energy direction from data; the boundary drawings and q7 are the evidence for the system-and-surroundings model.

Assessment criteria

CriterionProficient looks like
Data collectionAll seven readings recorded for each station to 0.1 °C, changes computed with the correct sign, and all four lines plotted and labeled on one graph.
Classification from evidenceEach station is classified using a measured temperature change, with fizzing explicitly excluded as evidence of direction; B and D are correctly placed in opposite categories.
System-and-surroundings modelBoundary drawings place the reacting matter inside and the water, cup and hand outside, with the energy arrow pointing out for A and in for B.
Equation and directionWord equations in q6 place energy with the reactants for B and with the products for D, with the placement justified by the measured direction.

Accessibility adaptations

Low-cost alternative

Run the four stations as a single teacher demonstration under a document camera with one probe thermometer, with students calling the times and recording the readings. Table salt and baking soda alone (without citric acid) give a smaller but still measurable cooling for station B if citric acid is unavailable; vinegar (30 mL in place of water) with 3 g baking soda also cools by a few degrees.

Model limitations

A cup of water is a stand-in for a pack: the pack's own water, plastic and your hand are the real surroundings, and the cup loses energy to the air faster than a sealed pouch would, so the measured changes are smaller than a pack would show. Stations A and C are dissolving processes rather than chemical reactions in the strict sense, which the debrief says plainly. The temperature change depends on the amounts, so '+9 °C' describes this cup, not calcium chloride in general. This activity has not been physically tested by the authors; the expected changes are estimates from the reagents' known behavior and should be piloted.

Teacher notes

Expect the classification to be unanimous even when the sizes vary; that agreement is the lesson. If a group's station B barely cooled, the baking soda was probably old or the water warm; the sign still should be negative. For q6, some students will write 'yeast' as a reactant at D; use it to introduce the word catalyst without assessing it. Keep the pooled class table for Lab 2, where the hot-pack teams start from station A's result and the cold-pack teams from station B's.

Angela's Tools · Chapter 14 · Energy in Chemical ReactionsLab 1 of 3 · Teacher guide