Angela's Tools · Chapter 18 · The Water Cycle Lab 1 of 3 · Recording sheet

Build, Test, Improve: a Solar Distiller That Runs on Sunlight and Gravity

Investigation question: How can you change a simple solar still so it turns more salt water into fresh water in a day, and how will your test data tell you whether the change helped?

Engineering design challengeGroups of 43 sessions Setup 10 · Activity 120 · Cleanup 10 min MS-ETS1-4 · assessesMS-ETS1-3 · practiceMS-ESS2-4 · practice
NameGroupDate

Your role today

Safety

Procedure

  1. Session 1. Sketch version 1 on the recording sheet: the basic still is the bowl with 300 mL of salt water, the empty cup standing in the middle (its rim above the water), plastic wrap sealed tight over the bowl, and a pebble on the wrap directly above the cup so the cover sags to a point. Label where light enters, where water evaporates, where vapor condenses, and how the drops reach the cup.
  2. Build version 1 exactly as sketched. Measure the inside diameter of the bowl and record it. Write a prediction of how many milliliters you expect in the cup after the run and why.
  3. Place the still in your marked light position and note the start time. Over the next 15 minutes, watch the cover and record the time the first fog appears and where the first drops gather.
  4. Session 2 (after the agreed run time). Without tilting the bowl, peel back the cover, lift the cup out, and measure its contents with the syringe or cylinder to the nearest 0.5 mL (or weigh it). Record the volume, the hours the still ran, and whether the collected water is colored or clear.
  5. Run the salt test: put three drops of the collected water on the black lid and three drops of the original salt water beside it, label both with the marker, and leave the lid to dry until the next session.
  6. Design lead proposes one change for version 2 based on the data and the water cycle (for example a black liner under the water, a taller or shorter cup, warm starting water, a tighter seal, a steeper cone). Change only that one feature. Write the prediction and the reason in the design log, rebuild with fresh salt water, and restart in the same position for the same run time.
  7. Session 3. Measure version 2 the same way, record it, and read the dried salt test: a white ring or crust means dissolved salt was in the drop; little or no residue means the water left its salt behind.
  8. Copy your feature change and both outputs to the class comparison table. As a class, look for features that raised output in more than one group and features that lowered it.
  9. Answer the analysis questions individually. If time allows, propose and sketch a version 3 that combines the two most promising features from different groups.

Record your observations

Lab 1 recording sheet: Build, test, improve a solar distiller

Fill in each prediction before the still runs. Record every measurement to the nearest 0.5 mL. Change only one feature between versions, and write down why you chose it.

✎Sketch version 1 from the side. Label: where light enters, where liquid water evaporates, where vapor condenses, the path the drops take to the cup, and the one place gravity is doing the work.
Design log (one row per version)
VersionWhat is different from the last versionPrediction (mL) and reasonRun time (hours)Water collected (mL)Color of collected waterSalt test resultKeep this feature? (yes/no and why)
1 (basic)nothing: this is the starting design
2
3 (if built)
First 15 minutes of version 1
Minutes after startFog on the cover? (none / patches / all over)Drops forming? where?Other observations
5
10
15
Class comparison table (copy from the wall chart)
GroupFeature changed in version 2Version 1 output (mL)Version 2 output (mL)Change (mL)Helped, hurt or no clear effect?
1.Describe what you saw on the cover in the first 15 minutes. Where did fog appear first, and where did the drops collect? Explain both using the words evaporation, condensation and gravity.
2.What color was the collected water, and what did the dried salt test show for each drop? What do those two results tell you about what did and did not travel from the bowl to the cup?

Analysis questions

3.Trace one water molecule from the salt water to the cup. For each step, name the change of state (if any), say whether the water gained energy, gave energy off, or just moved, and name what drove the step.
4.Explain why the water in the cup has no dye and little or no salt even though it came from dyed salt water. Then explain what this means for rain that falls from clouds formed over the ocean.
5.Use your bowl's inside diameter to find the area of the water surface (area = 3.14 × radius × radius, in cm²). Divide your best output by that area to get mL per cm² per run. Then estimate how many square meters of still (1 m² = 10,000 cm²) you would need to make 2,000 mL of fresh water per run. Show your work.
6.Did your version 2 change help, hurt, or have no clear effect? Compare the numbers to your prediction and explain the result with the mechanism (light absorbed, evaporation rate, condensation on the cover, drops reaching the cup).
7.Two groups each found a change that helped. Describe the test you would run to find out whether combining both changes gives an even larger output, and name two things you would keep the same.
8.Match the parts of the still to parts of Earth's water cycle (the salt water, the lamp or sunlight, the cover, the cup, the drops running down). Then name two real water cycle processes the still does not model at all.
9.Using the class comparison table, choose two features from different groups to combine in a version 3. Justify each choice with the numbers, and name one reason the combined output might not simply add up.
Angela's Tools · Chapter 18 · The Water CycleLab 1 of 3 · Student recording sheet