Learning target: I can write a claim-evidence-reasoning argument, using test data and a particle model, that explains where the water on a cold container comes from and why it forms.
In W1 you wrote a first explanation for the drops on a cold can. Now a class has run controlled tests. Read the scenario and the data table carefully; the numbers are a teaching dataset. Do the warm-up first, because it organizes your evidence. Then write your argument in the claim, evidence and reasoning boxes, and finish by answering a rival explanation.
You will need: This worksheet, Pencil, Highlighter (optional)
Ms. Ortiz's class wanted to settle the question from W1. They set up six tests in a classroom kept at 25 °C. Each container sat on a dry dish on an electronic balance, so any drops that formed, even ones that dripped onto the dish, stayed on the balance. After 15 minutes, students read the change in mass first, recorded whether drops formed, and only then pressed a white paper towel against the drops to check their color. A humidity meter showed how much water vapor the air held.
| Test | Container | Starting surface temperature (°C) | Air around it (humidity reading) | Drops after 15 min? | Color on white towel | Mass change (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Sealed can of purple grape juice from the refrigerator | 4 | Classroom air, humid day (60%) | Many drops, some dripped | Clear | +0.8 |
| B | Sealed can of purple grape juice at room temperature | 25 | Classroom air, humid day (60%) | None | Nothing to blot | 0.0 |
| C | Sealed glass jar of plain tap water from the refrigerator | 4 | Classroom air, humid day (60%) | Many drops | Clear | +0.7 |
| D | Sealed can of purple grape juice from the refrigerator | 4 | Inside the dry box (under 5%) | None | Nothing to blot | 0.0 |
| E | Sealed can of purple grape juice from the refrigerator | 4 | Classroom air, dry day (30%) | A faint mist in the first minutes that soon disappeared; no drops | Nothing to blot | 0.0 |
| F | Sealed empty can (air only) from the refrigerator | 4 | Classroom air, humid day (60%) | Mist and small beads for about 4 minutes, then they dried | Clear (blotted at minute 2) | 0.0 |
| Tests that support it | Tests that contradict it |
|---|---|
| The water came from inside the container. | |
| The water came from water vapor in the air. |
Claim: 'The water on the outside of a cold container comes from ___. It forms when ___ changes from a ___ to a ___, which is called ___.' Evidence: 'In test __, ___, but in test __, ___.' 'The mass in test A went up by ___, which shows ___.' Reasoning: 'Because the air is warmer than the can, heat flows from ___ to ___. The water vapor particles lose thermal energy, so they ___. When they are slow enough, ___.'
In test E, the can was cold but only a faint mist formed. Weather reporters use the dew point: the temperature to which air must be cooled for its water vapor to start condensing. Using tests A and E, explain why air with less water vapor has a lower dew point. Then predict whether a can at 15 °C would sweat on the humid day of test A, and describe a test you could run to find the temperature at which the can just starts to fog.