From 51 Birds to 325: The Parrot That Almost Vanished
I can describe what happened to the kākāpō, record what I notice and wonder, and write a first explanation of why a species nearly disappeared and why a growing population can still be at risk.
Chapter 27 · Unit 10: Humans and Changing Ecosystems · Segment 4
Why does biodiversity matter to how ecosystems work and to people, and how can we judge which plan best protects it?
Students figure out what biodiversity is, how to measure it in a sample, and why the full set of species an ecosystem naturally holds is a sign of its health. They compare a fragile Arctic tundra web, a kelp forest held together by a keystone predator, and a rainforest crowded with specialists, and trace how the loss of one population can spread to many others and to the people who rely on living things for medicines, food, materials and other ecosystem services. The chapter ends where the standard does: students evaluate competing plans for protecting biodiversity against agreed criteria and scientific, economic and social constraints, then combine the strongest parts of several plans, the way engineers paired a gecko-like texture with a mussel-like glue.
Estimated class time: presentation about 137 minutes · worksheets about 435 minutes in total · labs 5 sessions. Eight 50-minute periods: about three periods of presentation, discussion and worksheets spread across the week, two for Lab 1 (sampling outdoors, then calculating), one for Lab 2, and two for Lab 3. Several worksheets work as homework or as station work between labs; W8 and W9 each need close to a full period, so plan a ninth period if you use both in class.
The kākāpō is a heavy, flightless parrot that feeds at night and lives only in New Zealand. Hunting, forest clearing, and the cats, rats and stoats that people brought to New Zealand nearly wiped it out: in 1995 only 51 birds were known to be alive. Rangers moved every known bird to offshore islands, cleared those islands of predators, watched over each nest and gave breeding females extra food. On 1 September 2026 New Zealand's Department of Conservation announced an official count of 325, after a record 90 chicks survived from a single breeding season.
Notice and wonder prompts
California NGSS, Grade 7 Preferred Integrated Course Model. Each entry says whether this chapter's work assesses the performance expectation, gives practice toward it, or supports it as background; the resource lists below repeat this for every worksheet and lab.
Evaluate competing design solutions for maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services.
In Lab 3 students judge three plans for a damaged kelp coast, and their own combinations, against criteria for kelp cover and fish species and constraints of budget and community support, weighing the abalone fishery as an ecosystem service; the presentation task does the same for kākāpō habitat. W8 (five real island fox solutions), W9 (a salt-pond shoreline plan judged on marsh species, waterbirds and ecosystem services) and W10 items 10 and 12 also ask students to evaluate competing solutions. All produce direct evidence toward this Grade 7 PE.
Construct an argument supported by empirical evidence that changes to physical or biological components of an ecosystem affect populations.
Students argue from their own quadrat data that mowing changes which plants grow (Lab 1) and from survey data that losing urchin predators changed many populations in one kelp cove (Lab 2). Lab 1's evidence is empirical but small and confounded, and Lab 2's is simulated, so the chapter builds this Grade 7 practice rather than assessing the full PE.
Analyze data from tests to determine similarities and differences among several design solutions to identify the best characteristics of each that can be combined into a new solution to better meet the criteria for success.
The lesson's engineering spread combines a gecko-inspired texture with a mussel-inspired glue after testing each one. Students analyze that test story (slide 21) and, in Lab 3, use pilot data to pick the best characteristic of each single plan and combine them into a hybrid, then check it against the criteria; W9 q4 asks how a half-marsh, half-pond design borrows the best feature of two designs that each fail.
Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Lab 3, W9 and the presentation task use a pass-or-fail table for every criterion and constraint so that plans are compared the same way. The evaluation method is supplied rather than built by students, so this is practice toward the PE.
Biodiversity: why the variety of life matters, and how to choose a plan that protects it. Original, editable slides with speaker notes: a phenomenon opener, learning targets, the chapter's concepts with diagrams, vocabulary in context, 3 checks for understanding, 2 discussion prompts, an application task, a misconception check, a synthesis and an exit ticket.

Ten different tasks, one per instructional blueprint. Each has a student PDF (low ink, US Letter), an editable DOCX, an HTML preview, and a separate teacher answer key with reasoning.
I can describe what happened to the kākāpō, record what I notice and wonder, and write a first explanation of why a species nearly disappeared and why a growing population can still be at risk.
I can tell apart the three levels of biodiversity, choose the term that fits a real situation, and explain how pairs of biodiversity terms are related.
I can use evidence from a passage to explain the three levels of biodiversity and how habitat loss and invasive species reduce biodiversity at more than one level.
I can use a grid model of a landscape to tell habitat loss apart from habitat fragmentation, predict which species can survive, and design a wildlife crossing that reconnects habitat.
I can calculate species richness, proportions and Simpson's index of diversity from sample counts, graph the results, and use them to describe how an invasive plant changes a dune community.
I can write a claim-evidence-reasoning argument, using data, that an invasive species changed native ant diversity and a native predator population, and I can test the argument against another explanation.
I can find and explain the errors in a student's biodiversity report, correct a diversity index calculation, and rewrite each mistaken statement so it is scientifically accurate.
I can work with a team to trace how an invasive species and a pesticide led to the near loss of the island fox, evaluate five real solutions against shared criteria, and explain why a combination of solutions worked.
I can evaluate competing designs for restoring a bay shoreline against criteria and scientific, economic and social constraints, design an improved plan with calculations, and justify how it maintains biodiversity and ecosystem services.
I can show what I know about the levels of biodiversity, measuring it, why some ecosystems are fragile, how habitat loss and invasive species reduce it, and how to judge solutions that protect it.
Three different investigation approaches. Each has a teacher guide (purpose, materials with quantities, estimated cost, prep, safety, procedure, expected observations, debrief, answer key, assessment criteria, accessibility adaptations, low-cost alternative) and a student recording sheet.
Does a regularly mowed lawn or a less-managed patch of the schoolyard hold more plant biodiversity, and how many quadrats does it take to find out?
Two fictional kelp coves on the California coast went through the same sea star die-off and the same marine heat wave. Why did one keep its forest and most of its species while the other became an urchin barren?
Which plan, or combination of plans, can bring back Driftwood Cove's kelp forest and its species within ten years, on a fixed budget, with enough community support to go ahead?
Materials overview: Lab 1 needs quadrat frames (cardboard or PVC, 50 cm square), string for a 5 by 5 grid, a blunt skewer or pencil for point readings, dice, clipboards, hand lenses and a site the teacher has checked for hazards. Labs 2 and 3 are paper only: printed case files, clue cards, data tables, a calculator and colored pencils. The presentation needs only the slides; a photo of a kākāpō and of an urchin barren help.
Review status: reviewed · 2026-10-19 · Re-solved every numeric, multiple-choice, true/false, fill and table item in W1-W10 and Labs 1-3 by hand and by script: W5 Simpson's indexes 0.784, 0.592, 0.185 and native-only 0.70 (extension 0.224 and 0.380); W7 0.80 and 0.288; Lab 1 q5 0.66 and 0.14; W10 q3 0.62 and q8 537 percent; W4 patches 6, 3 and 9, only row 3 column 3 joins two patches (15 squares, 19 with the restored farms); W9 has 19 feasible pond plans, all opening exactly 4 ponds; Lab 2 totals and percent changes; every Lab 3 cost and pass-or-fail mark. All keys agreed. Verified against sources on 2026-10-19: kākāpō 51 birds (20 female) in 1995, 242 on 30 June 2025, 325 on 1 September 2026 with 90 chicks counted at 150 days (DOC); condors 607 and 392 free-flying at the end of 2025 (USFWS); southern sea otter 2019 index 2,962, the last published range-wide index found; white abalone 99 percent decline, 2001 listing, first outplant November 2019 (NOAA); red abalone closure extended on 18 December 2025 to 1 April 2036 (CDFW); island fox lows (450 to 15, 1,780 to 15, more than 1,400 to 55), 226 released, 2015 counts and the 2016 delisting (Interior); 2022 sea otter feasibility report took no position but recommended stakeholder engagement and small trials (USFWS). Liberty Canyon crossing: student text says it is scheduled to open in late 2026 (the announced date is 2 December 2026); W3, W4 and W10 teacher notes now tell teachers to check whether it has opened rather than asserting it has, and W10 q7's alternative was reworded to match. W4 Figure 3: the grasshopper sparrow rule now says the 4 Grass squares must lie in one connected habitat patch but need not touch, which is the reading the key uses (in 1950 the 9 Grass squares are scattered within the single 36-square patch). W1 count caption: the 90 chicks are the ones DOC added once the youngest surviving chick reached 150 days, so q4's inference that about 7 existing birds died holds. W8 q8 key no longer dates the fox low to 1999, which Card 2 does not say. Lab 3 results card: H6 support changed from 50 to 55 percent to match the plan card's rule that the support step raises an otter plan to 55 percent; no pass-or-fail mark changes. Cross-references corrected: slides 8, 11, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 25 now name what W1, W3, W4, W6, W8, W9 and W10 actually contain (W4 habitat fragmentation, W6 Argentine ants, W8 island fox, W9 salt-pond design); chapter.json sequence and evidenceOfLearning now describe W9 and W10 as written, and the MS-LS2-5, MS-ETS1-2 and MS-ETS1-3 notes name W8, W9 and W10 where they apply. Originality: no 6-word run shared with the lesson text in any file (scripted check); standards codes and caGrade checked in all 15 files; MS-LS4-4 on W3 stays supports with its Grade 8 note. Authoring notes retained: textbook corrections follow L27 reviewFlags RF1-RF15; labs not physically tested; W4-W6, W9, Lab 2 and Lab 3 data simulated and labeled.
Verified against the student edition of Bring Science Alive! 7th Grade Integrated (Student Edition). Printed page numbers appear in the book; PDF pages are the physical pages of the 524-page scan (printed + 36). The textbook is not reproduced on this site.
| Section | Printed pages | PDF pages | Used for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction: lesson question, vocabulary and the standards box | 358, 359 | 394, 395 | Lesson question, vocabulary list (biodiversity, proportion, niche, extirpation, keystone species, extinction) and the listed standards, including the integrity-of-biodiversity idea. |
| 1. The Importance of Biodiversity | 360, 361 | 396, 397 | Natural levels of biodiversity, named-species counts, the proportion worked example and the circle graph of species groups (slides 4-6, accuracy notes on dated counts). |
| 2. Fragile Tundra Ecosystems | 362, 363 | 398, 399 | Polar bears, seals and scavengers; sea-ice loss; fragility of low-biodiversity ecosystems (slides 8, 10, 11; hibernation and scavenger corrections). |
| 3. Keystone Species in the Kelp Forest | 364, 365 | 400, 401 | Sea otters, urchins and kelp; extirpation; keystone species and the arch analogy (slides 12-15, Lab 2, Lab 3). |
| 4. Many Niches in Tropical Rainforests | 366, 367 | 402, 403 | Year-round resources, specialized niches, the lesser anteater and canopy orchids (slides 8 and 16). |
| Key Science Concept: Biodiversity in Earth's Ecosystems | 368, 369 | 404, 405 | Global patterns on land and in the sea, from Arctic tundra to coral reefs (slide 7). |
| 5. Humans Benefit from Biodiversity | 370, 371 | 406, 407 | Medicines, materials, oil-eating bacteria, the gastric brooding frogs and the meaning of extinction (slides 14, 15 and 18). |
| 6. Engineering a Super Bandage (Engineering Design) | 372, 373 | 408, 409 | Testing a gecko-inspired and a mussel-inspired adhesive against criteria and combining them (slides 20-21, the combining step in Lab 3). |
| Lesson Summary | 373 | 409 | Check that every summary idea is covered by a learning target and a slide. |